So while searching the web for something interesting to post about, I found this interesting article (click on the word 'article' to see the article). I decided to explore this topic from a two person perspective.
Hey, look at this article (see above). I think it's highly relevant and helpful to writers of both science fiction and fantasy.
I can't believe you would show me an article like this. Fantasy is obviously for children and contains little to no sex. Wait, let me rephrase that, it contains no sex.
Um, how many fantasy books have you read?
Enough to know that the concept of putting such material into fantasy just makes it smut, therefore it is no longer considered fantasy.
So every fantasy book that contains physical relations goes from being fantasy into the world of smut once what, clothes come off, certain words are said, certain events are implied? Where is the line drawn?
It's very clear to me. No relations, possibly even no relationships = fantasy, any romantic inkling = smut.
Really, do we have to call it smut, why not just call it a romance novel?
Once you make the beast sound like it's less of a monster everyone wants to be its friend.
What do you mean?
Once you make smut sound like it's not smuth, it'll run rampant through fantasy and every other genre.
Um, it already does.
Curtains close, players bow, lights dim...
I know, from personal experience and from discussions with other writers that it is hard writing relationships especially when it comes to romance between characters. Writers are weary about people judging them if they write something too graphic or disturbing. But, physical relations are part of the real world and should be part of real fiction, no matter how hard it is to put those scenes out there for everyone to read/judge. I guess, if you're a reader of fantasy, enjoy: if you're a writer of fantasy, remember my short two person play (and feel free to perform it as often as you wish - either as you playing both parts or with an equally apathetic friend), worry often, write much and keep in mind that I didn't really read the article (see above) I just thought it was a funny topic.